HomePortalCalendarFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 FIN vs RX7 part deux

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Sanderson_FIN



Posts : 382
Join date : 2009-06-13
Age : 26
Location : Helsinki

PostSubject: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:45 pm

http://www.fileden.com/getfile.php?file_path=http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/2/4/1740216/uofairoparttwo.age3Yrec

rematch Port vs Iro
Back to top Go down
View user profile
E_Drenaline



Posts : 56
Join date : 2009-07-13
Age : 40

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:20 pm

Watched it.....Damn, you're mean. Very Happy

That was a better game but it seems like Iros just don't have anything for the Ports. UofA took the fight to you, no shame in his game. Much respect from me for both of you guys skillz. (For what little that is worth.)
Back to top Go down
View user profile
MTSP_fuher



Posts : 19
Join date : 2009-06-23
Location : Rio de Janeiro / Brasil

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:35 am

why did sanderson take a deck with 2 explorer card??
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sanderson_FIN



Posts : 382
Join date : 2009-06-13
Age : 26
Location : Helsinki

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:33 am

when things get tight you need some more explorers... helps me with forward building, trying to keep trade posts mine and the 100 gold it costs to buy them back when they die is a small price for crackshot or sharpshooter or whatever that is... I mainly use it against India's mahouts, not sure why I took that deck now, maybe I don't like using wood chopping cards with Portugal anymore
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Brett



Posts : 685
Join date : 2009-06-26
Age : 26

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:57 am

I don't use wood cards anymore either, I find Portugal's boom is acceptable without.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:42 am

MTSP_fuher wrote:
why did sanderson take a deck with 2 explorer card??
thats his trademark. 1 aweful card in every deck to demoralize the opponent. lol!
Back to top Go down
Brett



Posts : 685
Join date : 2009-06-26
Age : 26

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:03 pm

2 Explorer isn't really an awful card, crackshot is really useful and they can tank alot of damage with their 3K of HP.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sanderson_FIN



Posts : 382
Join date : 2009-06-13
Age : 26
Location : Helsinki

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:53 am

yea the HP is pretty big, even recovering explorer all the time and sending him straight towards enemy units is worth a card, enemy units shoot at the explorer units instead of your other units... and you have three of them! Very Happy they look awfully cool (musketeers!)
Back to top Go down
View user profile
cmontuptim



Posts : 91
Join date : 2009-07-04
Age : 29
Location : Adelaide, Australia

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:47 pm

Hmmm Ive been thinking of a card to replace wood cutting also for ports since I never send it before 40 (prefer advanced arsenal faster art etc etc)..Maybe extra explorers would be worth a shot...Like the pun? Smile
Back to top Go down
View user profile
E_Drenaline



Posts : 56
Join date : 2009-07-13
Age : 40

PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:10 am

Maybe extra explorers would be worth a shot...Like the pun? Smile[/quote]

*Rimshot* Very Happy
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: FIN vs RX7 part deux   

Back to top Go down
 
FIN vs RX7 part deux
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» HIGH ELF 500 PT Part Deux!
» Just Screwing around part Deux.....Blood Angels
» SIGNATURE WAR PART DEUX!
» GAMING NEWS PART DEUX
» charlie the unicorn PART 4

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
The TRT Forum :: Treaty 40 :: 1 versus 1-
Jump to: