HomePortalCalendarFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 ####### vs stone

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
eeyu

avatar

Posts : 190
Join date : 2009-07-01
Age : 21
Location : New Zealand - Where we worship Sheep

PostSubject: ####### vs stone   Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:53 am

http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/1/11/3056633//GCvsstonenoob.age3Yrec

lol
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Storm_

avatar

Posts : 184
Join date : 2011-01-07
Age : 26
Location : Let's just say... my feet are covering "This is not a step!"

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:31 am

Hmm well looks like from ELO that milky loses again!!! 28

So men please tell what happened.... i wont be able to watch this for another 12 hours and i cants waits thats longs
Back to top Go down
View user profile
eeyu

avatar

Posts : 190
Join date : 2009-07-01
Age : 21
Location : New Zealand - Where we worship Sheep

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:47 pm

Gendarme boxes me, i end up killing it after he killed all my wonders, then he gendarme spams me more at the front of my base. It's deccan, boomed 1950 as japan, stonecold was french. This was a 1v1 after he claimed i was noob and that andes was a spammy map. So what did he do? Deccan => french still get instant cav. Spammed Razz it took 40 minutes for him to finally breach my base and kill me because my training times were slow (daimyo/shoguns killed). He had a really bad boom, i was ahead for 80% of treaty. Not much to look at.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Storm_

avatar

Posts : 184
Join date : 2011-01-07
Age : 26
Location : Let's just say... my feet are covering "This is not a step!"

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:40 pm

LOL
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Storm_

avatar

Posts : 184
Join date : 2011-01-07
Age : 26
Location : Let's just say... my feet are covering "This is not a step!"

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:40 pm

ima flaem dis nub
Back to top Go down
View user profile
no rush general



Posts : 64
Join date : 2009-07-09
Age : 30
Location : British Empire

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:21 pm

Stone316 is both a cheater and crap player. Mad

Quote :
He had a really bad boom, i was ahead for 80% of treaty. Not much to look at.

Japan without a shogunate is doomed regardless of resources. You were outplayed by a noob.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
eeyu

avatar

Posts : 190
Join date : 2009-07-01
Age : 21
Location : New Zealand - Where we worship Sheep

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:01 pm

no rush general wrote:
Stone316 is both a cheater and crap player. Mad

Quote :
He had a really bad boom, i was ahead for 80% of treaty. Not much to look at.

Japan without a shogunate is doomed regardless of resources. You were outplayed by a noob.

TBH i was doing fine was just getting no where



1v1 me, im sure i won't get outplayed by the biggest n00b (you)

E: also, this goes to show that while im trying like fuck to make ashi n shit all french need is gendarme skirm mort to win lolololololololol it wasn't a serious game, he was just claiming that andes was a spam map then goes and hosts a 1v1 deccan as french lmao
Back to top Go down
View user profile
no rush general



Posts : 64
Join date : 2009-07-09
Age : 30
Location : British Empire

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:17 am

I'm too scared to do 1v1. I wouldn't be able to handle being the "biggest noob here (you)". No

I watched the record and wrote some things down:
-shrine placement messy
-sent reclaimed land 5% instead of sending consulate card
-France has TP, Japan has blue TP
-consulate to dutch in age II
-wonder close to river, in mortar range
-slow to send age III eco cards
-slow to build blue TP for eco tech
-consulate card never used, or at least, when it should be used, early on for cheaper consulate goodies
-initial army weak for anti-cavalry against france, obvious French strategy, so no excuse
-walls to weak on right
----treaty time ends----
-way too slow to react to enemy movements
-wrong side of walls, should always defend from inside, never chase siege cavalry boxes
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Storm_

avatar

Posts : 184
Join date : 2011-01-07
Age : 26
Location : Let's just say... my feet are covering "This is not a step!"

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:40 am

i doubt milky gave a shit about the game
Back to top Go down
View user profile
eeyu

avatar

Posts : 190
Join date : 2009-07-01
Age : 21
Location : New Zealand - Where we worship Sheep

PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:54 am

no rush general wrote:
I'm too scared to do 1v1. I wouldn't be able to handle being the "biggest noob here (you)". No

I watched the record and wrote some things down:
-shrine placement messy
-sent reclaimed land 5% instead of sending consulate card
-France has TP, Japan has blue TP
-consulate to dutch in age II
-wonder close to river, in mortar range
-slow to send age III eco cards
-slow to build blue TP for eco tech
-consulate card never used, or at least, when it should be used, early on for cheaper consulate goodies
-initial army weak for anti-cavalry against france, obvious French strategy, so no excuse
-walls to weak on right
----treaty time ends----
-way too slow to react to enemy movements
-wrong side of walls, should always defend from inside, never chase siege cavalry boxes


You actually watched it?
lol i would reccomend no one watch it. I love how you said my shrine placement was "messy", i'm like kerk 2.0 Smile
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: ####### vs stone   

Back to top Go down
 
####### vs stone
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Harry Potter & The Philosopher's stone *spoilers ahead*
» Stone Tower Temple replacement?
» Wyvern Stone Help!
» How to get curse of stone-tongue
» Dark Canvas 2: Blood & Stone

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
The TRT Forum :: Treaty 40 :: 1 versus 1-
Jump to: